Wimpfheimer v. Wandell
Wimpfheimer v. Wandell
192 A.D. 916
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff has complied with the requirements of the order of November 3, 1919. She had a perfect right to make the additional allegations by way of amendment (Backes v. Mechanics & Traders’ Bank, 130 App. Div. 20), and the order is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Blaekmar and Jaycox, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.