Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920

Chamberlin v. Chamberlin

Chamberlin v. Chamberlin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 10, 1920
194 A.D. 470; 185 N.Y.S. 98; 1920 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6672

Counsel

Boyal E. T. Biggs, of counsel for the plaintiff, for the motion., Charles Weishaupt, of counsel for the defendant, opposed.

Chamberlin v. Chamberlin

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

This is a motion for restitution to the plaintiff of the custody of the children of the parties, on the reversal of a decree made in an action for a judicial separation, in which the custody of the children was awarded to the defendant. If the rights of the litigants alone were to be considered, it would seem, the custody of the children having been given to the plaintiff in the separation agreement, that on the reversal of the decree depriving her of that custody, the children should be restored to her. In a case of this character the principal consideration is the interest and welfare of the children, which we cannot determine on this motion. The proper remedy is by writ of habeas corpus, in which proceeding the court will have the children before it and can make such disposition of the matter as will best serve their interest irrespective of the agreement or desires of the parties and unembarrassed by an order of this court.

Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Greenbaum, JJ.

Motion denied. Order of reversal settled and filed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.