Tanenbaum v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad
Tanenbaum v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad
194 A.D. 894
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, without costs, and without passing upon the merits, for the reason that it does not appear that a temporary injunction is necessary for the preservation of the rights of the plaintiffs as claimed. Present — Clarke P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.