Austin v. Rochester Folding Box Co.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the admission of evidence offered by the plaintiff, concerning the condition of Ms family was reversible error, wMeh was not cured by striking out the evidence in the absence of The jury. (Purcell v. Duncan Co., 107 App. Div. 501.) All concur, except Kruse, P. J., who dissents and votes for affirmance.