Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921

In re Kaufmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 11, 1921 · Clarke

195 A.D. 830; 187 N.Y.S. 213; 1921 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4842

Counsel

Einar Chrystie, for the petitioner., Crim & Wemple, for the respondent.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

In re Kaufmann (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1928)
In re Ackerson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1926)
In re Kaufmann (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1925)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Clarke, P. J.:

The respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law at the October, 1905, ter,m of the Appellate Division, First Department, and has practiced as such attorney since his admission.

He was joined as a defendant in the same indictment referred to in Matter of Lindheim (195 App. Div. 827), handed down herewith, and was convicted at the same time and for the same offense and received the same punishment.

It follows for the reasons set forth in said opinion that he , must be disbarred.

Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Greenbaum, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred. Settle order on notice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.