Brightson v. Claflin

I dissent upon the ground that, in my opinion, the defendant should have pleaded that the stock was held by the company as collateral for the note. (See Barber v. Ellingwood, No. 2, 137 App. Div. 704, 714.) Were it not for this technical omission so to plead, I would vote for affirmance.

Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, .Smith, Page and Merrell, JJ.; Laughlin, J., dissenting.