Shapiro v. Kenmare Auto Co.
Shapiro v. Kenmare Auto Co.
197 A.D. 935
Opinion of the Court
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. .No opinion. Present — Dowling, Laughlin, Smith, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ. Greenbaum, J., dissents. Dowling, J., dissents on the ground that the plaintiffs have failed to establish that they procured a customer who was financially able to enter into a lease or sublease of the premises in question.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.