Low v. Magruder
Low v. Magruder
198 A.D. 944
Opinion of the Court
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Blackmar, P. J., Rich, Kelly and Manning, JJ., concur; Mills, J., dissents upon the ground that, under the circumstances, for the plaintiff to characterize his experience in being convicted and sent to the Elmira Reformatory when a young man as a youthful indiscretion, was not a false representation.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.