Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922

Jarvis v. Lavine

Jarvis v. Lavine
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 31, 1922
200 A.D. 552; 193 N.Y.S. 331; 1922 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8221

Counsel

Morris Grossman, for the appellant., No appearance for respondent.

Jarvis v. Lavine

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Rule 45 of the Rules of Civil Practice requires the summons to be in substantially the form therein provided. We think the form of the summons - provided by section 418 of the Code of Civil Procedure is a substantial compliance with the provisions of said rule, and the court obtains jurisdiction by the service of the summons in the old form.

The order appealed from is, therefore, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Present — Dowling, Laughlin, Smith, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.