Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923

Gilliland v. Konta

Gilliland v. Konta
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 15, 1923
206 A.D. 685
Gilliland v. Konta

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

In the absence of a showing by the plaintiff of the greater convenience of witnesses, the action should be tried in the county where the cause of action arose. (Bell v. Whitehead Brothers Co.,5 App. Div. 555; Osterhout v. Rabe, 39 id. 413; Jacina v. Lemmi, 155 id. 397.) The order appealed from should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Merrell, Finch and McAvoy, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.