Freedman v. Goldfarb

Order affirmed, without costs. We are of opinion that the Special Term had jurisdiction to entertain the motion in the circumstances shown by the record, and that it was not an abuse of discretion to open the default. Neither at Special Term nor in this court did the appellants seek the imposition of terms as a condition of opening the default; hence, we affirm the order without terms. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.