Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924

Kedrovsky v. Rojdesvensky

Kedrovsky v. Rojdesvensky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1924
209 A.D. 852
Kedrovsky v. Rojdesvensky

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Since the question of the authorized representative of the true Russian church is in such doubt under these papers, we deem it best to allow the matter to be settled after a trial of the issues. The order denying the motion for a temporary injunction should, therefore, be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the order confirming the referee’s report should be affirmed, without costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, McAvoy and Martin, JJ. On the first appeal: Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. On the second appeal: Order affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.