Fritz v. Friedland

Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the facts proven were such as to require submission of the question as to whether reasonable care did not require defendant to more securely pile the lumber, or to guard and protect it. (Earl v. Crouch, 10 N. Y. Supp. 882.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.