Scanlon v. Stevens
Scanlon v. Stevens
211 A.D. 833
Opinion of the Court
Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the error in the court’s instruction in response to the inquiry of the jury as to what would constitute prescriptive rights, may be disregarded, as not affecting any substantial right of the defendant. (Civ. Prae. Act, § 106.) It did not bear on any issue submitted under the evidence.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.