Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925

Pollack v. Hawkeye Securities Fire Insurance

Pollack v. Hawkeye Securities Fire Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 27, 1925
212 A.D. 477; 208 N.Y.S. 804; 1925 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9487

Counsel

Thomas J. Cummings [James M. H. Wallace and Joseph Swart of counsel], for the appellant., O’Connor, Newton & Doyle [Thomas L. Newton of counsel], for the respondent.

Pollack v. Hawkeye Securities Fire Insurance

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Plaintiff herein, as assignee of the insured, Irving Siegel, brought action on a policy of fire insurance. The trial was had in November, 1922, and resulted in a verdict for plaintiff. At that time the insured was under indictment for arson growing out of the fire. The trial of the indictment was had in June, 1923. There was a judgment of conviction which was subsequently affirmed by this court and by the Court of Appeals. (People v. Siegel, 208 App. Div. 716; affd., 238 N. Y. 589.) Material evidence given on the criminal trial was unknown and hence not used in the civil trial. Under these circumstances we think the motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence, denied before the criminal appeal was heard," should have been granted.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the motion granted, with costs to abide the event.

All concur. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Davis, Crouch and Taylor, JJ

Order denying motion for new trial on ground of newly-discovered evidence reversed, with costs, and motion granted, with costs to abide event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.