Leder v. Skaletsky
Leder v. Skaletsky
212 A.D. 829
Opinion of the Court
Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs, on the ground that the defense of usury is personal to the borrower (Terminal Bank v. Dubroff, 66 Misc. 100), and is not available to the respondent. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.