In re the Summary Proceedings by Norton
In re the Summary Proceedings by Norton
212 A.D. 845
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Stevens v. Nye (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1954)
- President & Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Nieberg (City of New York Municipal Court 1936)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, on the ground that even though the contract of sale may have been abandoned the conventional relation of landlord and tenant did not exist and that a summary proceeding is, therefore, an improper remedy under the authority of Evertson v. Sutton (5 Wend. 281); Benjamin v. Benjamin (5 N. Y. 383) and People ex rel. Mitchell v. Simpson (28 id. 55).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.