Magnus v. New
Magnus v. New
212 A.D. 878
Opinion of the Court
Order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, but without prejudice to a renewal of the motion as to one or both causes of action after the complaint has been amended as directed, and after service of answer. See opinion in Magnus v. New (ante, p. 123), decided herewith. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.