Piscopo v. National Dry Dock & Repair Co.
Piscopo v. National Dry Dock & Repair Co.
213 A.D. 836
Opinion of the Court
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The technical error in charging the comparative negligence rule was harmless, as there was no evidence upon which a finding of contributory negligence could have been based. (Amato v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co., 209 App. Div. 882.) Present—Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Young, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.