Hyde & Behman Amusement Co. v. Staeudel

Judgment reversed upon the law, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. No obligation oí the defendant to pay the rent while the corporation continued in possession can be spelled out of the correspondence in this case, nor does the proof warrant the conclusion that plaintiff was led into permitting the corporation to remain in possession by reason of this correspondence. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Lazansky, JJ., concur.