Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926

People v. Kaplan

People v. Kaplan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 6, 1926
217 A.D. 252; 217 N.Y.S. 763; 1926 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7787

Counsel

D. Francis Searle, for the appellant., Charles L. DeAngelis [John J. McGinty of counsel], for the respondent.

People v. Kaplan

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We are of the opinion that the magistrate under the exception contained in section 5 of the Judiciary Law had the power on Sunday to receive the plea of guilty of the offense charged against this defendant under subdivision 4 of section 887 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (People ex rel. Burke v. Fox, 150 App. Div. 114; affd., 205 N. Y. 490.) However, in this case, inasmuch as the defendant was a minor and it was her first conviction, we have determined to exercise the discretionary power vested in appellate courts by section 543 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and to reduce the sentence to the time already served. (People v. Byrne, 194 App. Div. 919.)

All concur. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Davis, Sears, Crouch and Taylor, JJ.

Order and judgment of conviction modified by reducing the sentence to the time already served, and as so modified affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.