Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926

Apfel v. Auditore

Apfel v. Auditore
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1926
217 A.D. 724
Apfel v. Auditore

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Since the plaintiff’s cause of action is to recover upon an unliquidated claim, it does not come within the provision of rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The granting of the motion for summary judgment was, *725therefore, unauthorized. The judgment and orders appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Merrell, Finch, Martin and Wagner, JJ. Judgment and orders reversed, wi1h costs, and motion for summary judgment denied, with ten dollars costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.