Peerless Light Co. v. Gimbel Bros.

— Order granting leave to serve amended answer affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur; Lazansky, J., dissents, and votes for a modification to provide for the service of the answer to the amended complaint as proposed, except as to the defense that plaintiff was not authorized to do business in the State of New York. (See Wood & Selick v. Ball, 190 N. Y. 217.)