Claim of Clayton v. Walker-Hayes
Claim of Clayton v. Walker-Hayes
219 A.D. 848
Opinion of the Court
Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that an improper basis and method have been employed in fixing claimant’s wage rate; it should be determined under subdivisions 2 and 4 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (Mackin v. Press Publishing Co., 209 App. Div. 252.) Van Kirk, Acting P. J., Hinman, McCann Davis and Whitmyer, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.