Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927

Keenan v. Fifth Avenue Coach Co.

Keenan v. Fifth Avenue Coach Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 6, 1927 · McAvoy
220 A.D. 432; 221 N.Y.S. 550; 1927 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9323

Counsel

Ben B. Mittler, for the appellant., Ambrose Clogher of counsel \\Henry J. Smith, attorney], for the respondent.

Keenan v. Fifth Avenue Coach Co.

Opinion of the Court

McAvoy, J.

This cause was tried before the court and a jury and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $9,950. Upon the rendition of the verdict the defendant made a motion to set the verdict aside and for a new trial. The trial justice decided to grant the motion unless the plaintiff consented to a reduction of the verdict to $7,000, without interest or costs. The plaintiff filed a consent and stipulated to reduce the verdict to the sum of $7,000 which omitted therefrom the words without interest or costs,” and thereafter entered judgment for $7,000 plus interest and costs, amounting in all to $8,061, on February 7, 1927.

On February 23, 1927, the defendant moved for the resettlement of the order and reformation of the judgment to conform to the decision, and said motion was granted and an order pursuant thereto entered on March 2, 1927, and it is from that order the plaintiff appeals.

It is apparent that the intention of the trial justice was to reduce the verdict to such a sum that the judgment with interest and costs would amount to no more than $7,000. The stipulation filed by the plaintiff had not that effect. Therefore, the court had no power to order judgment for that amount.

The order should, therefore, be modified by vacating the judgment herein entered February 7, 1927, and granting the motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial, unless plaintiff stipulates within ten days from service of the order to be entered hereon to reduce the judgment to such a sum as, together with interest to be added by the clerk and costs, will amount to $7,000, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements of this appeal to the appellant.

Dowling, P. J., Mereell, Finch and Proskauer, JJ., concur.

Order modified as indicated in opinion and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. Settle order on notice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.