Claim of Zaro v. Zaro Tourist & Steamship Ticket Agency, Inc.
Claim of Zaro v. Zaro Tourist & Steamship Ticket Agency, Inc.
222 A.D. 700
Opinion of the Court
The carrier having been given an opportunity on the argument to procure if possible representation by the employer on this- appeal and having been unable to do so the appeal must be dismissed. (See Matter of Hammele v. McMahon, 220 App. Div. 60.) Cochrane, P. J., Van Kirk, Hinman, McCann and Whitmyer, JJ., concur. Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs against the insurance carrier to the State Industrial Board.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.