Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927

Schmelzer v. Lapp

Schmelzer v. Lapp
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 15, 1927
222 A.D. 724
Schmelzer v. Lapp

Opinion of the Court

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law for the following reasons: Plaintiff was entitled to rely somewhat upon an observance of the law .by the automobile driver; but he was also obligated to use reasonable caution affirmatively in safeguarding himself. His own testimony shows that he failed entirely to do so, and there is no testimony to the contrary. Therefore, I dissent and vote for reversal and a dismissal of the complaint on the ground that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Sears, Crouch, Taylor and Sawyer, JJ. -.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.