Foreman v. Foreman

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Rich, Young and Carswell, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Seeger, J., dissent upon the ground that the rule in Woolley v. Stewart (222 N. Y. 347) and Burns v. McCormick (233 id. 230) is not applicable in a ease where the agreement is between husband and wife.