Parton v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Parton v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
224 A.D. 672
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Rich, Young, Seeger and Seudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes for a reversal and a new trial upon the ground that the finding that plaintiff did not know the nature of the paper he signed is against the weight of the evidence. [129 Misc. 493.]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.