Malter v. New York Indemnity Co.

While we think there was enough evidence to make the question of visible marks of forcible entry at the third window one of fact, we agree with the ultimate conclusion of the trial justice that as the trier of the facts he should direct a verdict for the defendant. The judgment appealed from should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs. Present—-Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and Proskauer, JJ. Judgment affirmed, with costs.