In re Chambers

Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the matter remitted to the Special Term to take proof upon the issues presented. We are of opinion that in this case, in determining and enforcing an attorney’s lien, such issues were presented that the demands of justice require a hearing either in open court or before a referee. (Matter of Speranza, 186 N. Y. 280; Matter of King, 168 id. 53, 58.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.