Brugno v. Meiselman
Brugno v. Meiselman
225 A.D. 686
Opinion of the Court
Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The order was improperly made for the reason that its effect is to bring in a new party — a defendant who has not been brought into court in this action. (Gray v. Vought & Co., 216 App. Div. 230.) Rich, Young, Seeger and Scudder, JJ., concur. Lazansky, P. J., dissents.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.