Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929

Goldberg v. Blank

Goldberg v. Blank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 15, 1929 · Proskauer
226 A.D. 863
Goldberg v. Blank

Opinion of the Court

No opinion. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, MeAvoy and Proskauer, JJ.; Proskauer, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

Proskauer, J. (dissenting).

In my opinion the referee incorrectly and inexactly fixed the items “ Collection expense on old accounts collected up to Dec. 19, 1925,” “ Overhead, including surcharge, involved in the collection of said accounts up to Dec. 19, 1925,” and “ Proportion of overhead expense allowed on collection of old accounts ” after December 19, 1925. These items should have been fixed respectively at $5,199.20, $8,074.11 and $2,249. The allowance to the plaintiff was excessive. For these reasons I dissent from the affirmance of the judgment.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.