In re Masi
In re Masi
227 A.D. 804
Opinion of the Court
Order modified so as to provide that leave to commence and maintain the action or actions referred to in the order appealed from be limited to the Service Bond and Mortgage Corporation, and as so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Respondent fails to show sufficient reasons for granting the order as to appellants Danzilo and Birner. (Darmstadt v. Manson, 144 App. Div. 249.) Young, Rich, Hagarty, Seeger and Scudder, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.