Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930

Deligtisch v. Borson

Deligtisch v. Borson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 2, 1930
229 A.D. 201; 241 N.Y.S. 847; 1930 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10339

Counsel

Solomon Millendorf of counsel [Bergner, Millendorf & Bergner, attorneys], for the appellant., Jonah J. Goldstein of counsel [S. S. Goldsmith with him on the brief; Goldstein & Goldstein, attorneys], for the respondent.

Deligtisch v. Borson

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The affidavits and order appealed from show that there was no actual strike but that the defendant attempted to initiate the controversy by acts of violence, intimidation and interference with the free entrance of patrons and employees into plaintiff’s premises.

Under such circumstances, the provisions of the order appealed from cannot be sustained.

The order should be reversed in so far as appealed from, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Dowling, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Sherman, JJ.

Order so far as appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs ane disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Settle order on notice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.