Lamberton v. Delaware & Hudson Co.
Lamberton v. Delaware & Hudson Co.
230 A.D. 749
Opinion of the Court
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the charge of the trial court as to warning signals by whistle and bell did not contain reversible error under the pleadings, proofs and circumstances of this case, and on the authority of Smith v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co. (77 App. Div. 43) and Cepenobwiz v. New York Central & H. R. R. R. Co. (147 id. 188, 193). Present — Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Hill and Hasbrouek, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.