Hurdman v. Royal Development Co.
Hurdman v. Royal Development Co.
230 A.D. 787
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs. (Graf v. Hope Building Corp., 254 N. Y. 1.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young and Carswell, JJ., concur; Scudder, J., dissents and vptes to reverse upon the ground that the conduct of the plaintiffs does not seem to be consistent with good conscience.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.