Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930

In re the Estate of Covert

In re the Estate of Covert
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 15, 1930
231 A.D. 863
In re the Estate of Covert

Opinion of the Court

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county granting respondents, appellants, Eastman & Eastman an allowance of $1,250 and denying application of respondent, appellant, Gumbes for an allowance affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to Eastman & Eastman, payable out of the estate. Respondent, appellant, Gumbes rendered no valuable service to the estate and was not an attorney for a representative of the estate or of one who was interested therein. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.