Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931

Schatz v. Christel

Schatz v. Christel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 10, 1931
232 A.D. 160; 249 N.Y.S. 804; 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13757

Counsel

Henry Mayer, for the appellants., O. H. Droege, for the respondent.

Schatz v. Christel

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs are entitled to an injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with their business or employees, or any person or persons, corporation or corporations doing business with the plaintiffs and from threatening, intimidating, coercing or using force upon the plaintiffs and their customers and from asserting by any written matter that the plaintiffs are conducting a non-union shop, or that there is a strike in process in plaintiffs’ shop, and from in any way preventing the public or customers from doing business with the plaintiffs.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted to the extent indicated.

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted to the extent indicated. Settle order on notice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.