Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931

Ackerman v. Goldstein

Ackerman v. Goldstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 15, 1931
232 A.D. 839
Ackerman v. Goldstein

Opinion of the Court

Order in so far as it denies motion to amend complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The proposed amendment is not within the purview of section 105 of the Civil Practice Act. While the amendment may, upon a proper showing, be permitted, the issue tendered thereby must be the subject of a trial, and without a finding of fact that defendants’ representations were knowingly *840false, the plaintiff would not be entitled to judgment. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.