In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Hale
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Hale
232 A.D. 859
Opinion of the Court
Motion of appellants Baucus and others for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs to Herbert D. Hamm, Esq., attorney for respondent, and ten dollars costs to Charles Grosberg, Esq., special guardian, payable out of the estate. Motion of said appellants for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Motion of appellants Miller for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs to Herbert D. Hamm, Esq., attorney for respondent, and ten dollars costs to Charles Grosberg, Esq., special guardian, payable out of the estate. Motion of said appellants for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.