Haggerty v. Ruane
Opinion of the Court
Order denying motion for a preference affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Order denying examination before trial affirmed without prejudice to a renewal upon a notice specifying that the defendant be examined as to any representations or promises made in connection with the contract of sale of the property; that the indebtedness of defendant or the said copartnership was canceled by plaintiff and so regarded by defendant at the time of the transaction referred to; that no deed has been delivered to plaintiff and the reasons therefor; the solvency of the defendant’s firm during February, 1927, and for several months thereafter; and the improvements made to the property by the plaintiff to the knowledge or with the consent of the defendant. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.