Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931

Zukowsky v. Zukowsky

Zukowsky v. Zukowsky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 15, 1931
233 A.D. 745
Zukowsky v. Zukowsky

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. There has been no motion to dismiss the complaint or for an order of discontinuance, and as the plaintiff claims that an agreement was made that the reconciliation was to be temporary, with all rights in the action surviving, she has the right to test her legal theory that there has been no abandonment or abatement of the action. (Smith v. Smith, 35 Hun, 378; affd., 99 N. Y. 639; Tackaberry v. Tackaberry, 101 Mich. 102; Davison v. Davison, 182 Iowa, 1116.) On this subject we express no opinion. Until the question, not here directly presented, as to her right to prosecute the action further has been determined, she is entitled to counsel fees. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.