Klein v. Klein
Klein v. Klein
233 A.D. 771
Opinion of the Court
Order modified by striking out item 1 thereof as unnecessary because of the fact that the matter sought to be elicited is admitted in the answer; by striking from item 3 the words “ and at other times;” and also by striking out item 4 upon the ground that it is vague and indefinite. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs; examination to proceed on five days’ notice at the place and hour stated in the order. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.