Kaderavek v. Fuetterer
Kaderavek v. Fuetterer
233 A.D. 775
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Plaintiff did not seasonably make a motion to amend the verdict and now his only remedy is to move to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. (MacDonald v. Kusch, 188 App. Div. 491.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.