Claim of Glicksman v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.
Claim of Glicksman v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.
234 A.D. 810
Opinion of the Court
Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. All concur, except Van Kirk, P. J., and Whitmyer, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and for dismissal of claim, on the ground that the claimant was not in the course of the employment when injured. (Johnson v. Faribault Bldg. Corp., 192 App. Div. 929; revd. on dissenting opinion below, 229 N. Y. 626; Culhane v. Economical Garage Co., 188 App. Div. 1.)
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.