Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932

Kahn v. Wertheim

Kahn v. Wertheim
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 15, 1932
235 A.D. 627; 254 N.Y.S. 1054
Kahn v. Wertheim

Opinion of the Court

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to require defendant to appear for examination to enable plaintiff to frame Ms complaint reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. The facts asserted by the plaintiff, standing undemed, require that he be permitted to examine the defendant so as to enable Mm to frame a complaint upon the theory, applicable to the facts, wMeh he deems desirable. (Teall v. Roeser, 206 App. Div. 371; Heye v. American Chemical Eduction Co., 185 id. 13.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.