Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932

Brooks v. Brooks

Brooks v. Brooks
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 15, 1932
235 A.D. 743
Brooks v. Brooks

Opinion of the Court

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to dismiss counterclaim in defendant’s answer reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the defendant to amend his answer by pleading the facts stated in the counterclaim as a defense, upon payment of ten dollars costs. The matters pleaded as a counterclaim may constitute a defense, but may not be pleaded as a counterclaim. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.