Woods v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Boston

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the second defense from defendant’s answer affirmed. Order granting defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to serve a reply to the separate defenses interposed in the answer of defendant modified by providing that the plaintiff need not reply to the third partial defense and, as so modified, affirmed, all without costs of this appeal. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.