Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932

Claim of Kantor v. William Armstrong Publishing Co.

Claim of Kantor v. William Armstrong Publishing Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided July 15, 1932
236 A.D. 749
Claim of Kantor v. William Armstrong Publishing Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Assuming that the claimant stepped out of his employment when he went to get a drink of lemonade (Matter of Clark v. Voorhees, 231 N. Y. 14), he was within the course of his employment when ascending the stairway leading to his employer’s premises to perform the duties of his employment by a way provided by the employer. (Ross v. Howieson, 232 N. Y. 604; Matter of Kowalek v. N. Y. Cons. R. R. Co., 229 id. 489.) The award should be affirmed. All concur. McNamee, J., not voting. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.